Dr. Marilyn Kourilsky and Dr. Al Osborne,
co-founders of the Institute for the Study of Educational
Entrepreneurship (ISEE), convened the first ISEE Think
Tank to focus on the topics of educational entrepreneurship
and social entrepreneurship. The rationale for convening
this event was driven by a growing recognition that
the worlds of education and entrepreneurship are converging.
ISEE itself is an example, as it is a partnership
between UCLA's Graduate School of Education and Information
Studies and the Anderson School. Unfortunately, most
current academic research in the area tends to focus
either on education or entrepreneurship ? with almost
no attention given to the interaction of the two fields.
The Think Tank addressed this gap in the research
by inviting eight presenters, all foremost scholars
in their fields, to write thought-provoking white
papers that probe the policy issues and potential
impact on policy-making associated with social and
educational entrepreneurship. Seventeen participants,
drawn from regional and national government organizations,
educationally oriented entrepreneurs, and other leading
education and entrepreneurship faculty and administration,
were invited to review the presenters' papers, provide
feedback and join in the ensuing discussions. Together,
the presenters and participants addressed the following
sets of guiding questions:
1. What is the potential impact of educational
entrepreneurship (both for profit and not-for-profit)
on public school reform in general, and on urban school
reform in particular? What are some of the key issues
to consider?
2. Can 'social impact' be compatible
with 'for profit' wealth creation? How does a social
entrepreneur manage the trade-offs? Under what conditions
are both goals aligned, and under what conditions
are they in conflict?
The goals of the Think Tank were three-fold: 1) to
encourage thought-provoking discussion among the presenters
and a select group of participants who represent leading
researchers in and practitioners of social and educational
entrepreneurship; 2) to formulate a research agenda
for social and educational entrepreneurship; and 3)
to formulate guidelines for curricula to foster the
knowledge and skills of educational leaders and entrepreneurs.
The format of the Think Tank was that
each presenter had the opportunity to present his
or her paper and then address questions presented
by the participants. Participants also provided suggestions
for paper modifications and enhancements. On the second
day, presenters and participants were divided into
two groups to discuss the following two questions:
1) What types of research would prove most beneficial
for informing future policy decisions by education,
business, and government leaders? and 2) What skills,
knowledge, and experiences would assist school leaders
and entrepreneurs in fostering innovative initiatives
and approaches at schools to meet the changing needs
of students and society?